Nowadays, in 21th century, people across the globe consider that evolving of technology are rising the difference between wealthy and indigent people; however, another part opposes this sentence. This essay will examine both opinions and argue in favour of the former.
On the one hand, there are plenty of arguments that advocate the opinion of soaring social life’s diversity as a consequence of developing modern technologies. The main argument to support the former opinion is high price of using technologies. For instance , recently , scientists have found new method of cooking meals by using specialized robot so that people could save their time and other resources to people. However, those ways of cuisine science are overpriced for impoverished humans, hence, that is the reason why it is only used by wealthy people.
On the other hand , instead of creating the gap between people in different financial situations , more and more scientists are building the bridge for all of them. One of the main argument to support this idea is enhancing people’s knowledge through free websites and apps. Currently,every human being is able to find all researches, video lessons and even start to master completely new language to him. For example, if person desire to prepare for his examine test , he will be able to do this by using video resources from Internet programs. Furthermore , no matter of social statue, everyone will be accessed to the same information.
Having considered both beliefs , it can be concluded that both of them have their validity; however, I am more inclined to support the former side of generating the contract between distinct in a life profit. In this world, people who have access to wealth always will be a priority. Not only do rich people reach the authority, but they also are most honourable persons alive.