Some individuals consider that visitors to other countries should follow local customs while others claim that the host country should embrace cultural dissimilarities. I would argue that the host country should welcome cultural inequities.
When it comes to tourists indigenous communities are concerned about disappearance of native customs and behaviour. Moreover, these local populations cannot admit the possibility of modifying, on the grounds that the visitors bring their cultural differences. Inhabitants do not intend dissimilarities such as differences in religious beliefs, ethnic distinctions. For example, during the period that the India was discovered, populations from other continents commenced to flow this area. This steady flow of tourists lead to the transformation of native customs.
On the other hand, embracing new traditions accounts for improvement in countries. Governments that welcome lifestyles of foreigners are tend to gain more development. Governments should tolerate modernity that visitors bring with them. Native people can widen their understanding of dissimilar transitions, as learning from tourists instead of admitting their lifestyle. For instance, Geography is taught in schools as well as the history of the word. Schools inform children about numerous countries and their traditions from the earliest age. That type of steady flow of tourists expands education in considerable ways.
To sum up, although some of the public consider that visitors to other countries should follow local customs while others claim that host country should accept these inequities, I strongly believe that the tourist should be welcomed.