There is a view that the best way to decrease traffic congestion is in urban areas limiting the need for physical displacement.
While minimizing the necessity of commuting for work, retail, and education for everyone could be effecient, I completely disagree with this idea for some reasons. Reducing the need to travel can help, but it cannot be the only effective solution.
On the one hand , if people do not need to commute daily, traffic naturally falls.For example, the majority of people choose remote work, online education, and home delivery services, so this can reduce the number of vehicles on the road. When fewer workers travel during rush hour, congestion decreases and travel time become shorter for everyone. Most of large companies allow their employees to work from home a few days a week that have already shown result of reducing peak- hour traffic . That means this approach can significantly diminish traffic congestion.
However ,many jobs can not be done remotely. Doctors, construction workers, teachers, and service workers must travel physically to their workplaces. Even if government expand remote options, cities will still experience traffic unless governments improve public transportation, cycling infrastructure, and urban planning.For instance, efficient metro systems, bus lanes, and walkable neighborhoods can move large numbers of people without increasing car congestion. Therefore, enhancing public transportation, cycling infrastructure, and urban planning are essantial as well as limiting the need for commuting from home to job, studying, or shopping.
In conclusion, reducing the need to travel can certainly ease traffic congestion, especially through remote work and online services. Nevertheless, it should be considered one strategy among many, rather than the only solution, since improved public transportation and better urban planning are also essential for managing traffic in modern cities.