In the contemporary world, with advancements in technology and globalization, it has become increasingly common for individuals to manage their household chores along with job responsibilities by robots aid, particularly in developed countries. While there are certain advantages associated with simplifying range of tasks in life, I strongly maintain that drawbacks of this approach present more negative consequences in the long-term run.
Proponents of people relying on robots cite numerous reasons to protect their stance. When individuals use a robot to complete their housework, it provides them with more spare time on themselves and minimize the need for extra physical labor, thus they will have a chance to recharge their mental batteries after busy day, without thinking of washing the dishes, swiping the floor and so on. Furthermore, when it comes to workplace, robots offer bright opportunities such as counting all finances, cleaning and searching database info, finding a certain pdf. As a result, robots enhance our overall quality of life.
On the other hand, critics assert that drawbacks of public being dependent on robots carry greater weigh. When people usually rely on robots to solve particular task at work, they not only loose their critical and practical thinking, but also face concerns with bad memory. Because after common robots aid on everything, individuals simply forget how to tackle their problems and daily tasks by themselves, thereby slowly developing laziness, which is deteriorating for their overall well-being.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on whether using robots is beneficial or not, I support the view that in a world where all people are already addicted for AI assistance and support, without using their own mind, it is important to maintain a balance between both.
фидбек, мой балл