The ongoing debate surrounding whether there seems to be an increasing number of serious crimes committed each year. It remains a highly contentious issue. Some people feel that the best way is to use the death penalty as a deterrent, whereas others maintain other measures will be needed. Both perspectives merit consideration; however, I am strongly convinced that crime. A combination of effective policing, education, rehabilitation, and social support is a more sustainable way to reduce serious crime. This essay will examine both viewpoints in detail before articulating my own stance.
On the one hand, many hold the view that fear of execution may stop people from committing murder or terrorism. For instance, many crimes are linked to poverty and lack of education. Subject, dangerous criminals can never offend again. Hence, better job opportunities can reduce the crime.
On the other hand, others content that governments can invest in schools and vocational training. Notably, youth programs keep teenagers away from gangs. For example, governments can organize free sports clubs, music classes, and after-school activities to keep teenagers busy and reduce the risk of joining gangs. Accordingly, better policing increases the chance of criminals being caught. Also CCTV cameras and modern technologies help to solve crimes.
In conclusion, while both sides put forth compelling arguments, I firmly believe that better policing increases and less serious crimes will occur.