An issue of accessibility of private information for a state with aim of security is strongly debated topic nowadays. While some personalities claim that an invasion of privacy is justified in the name of well-being, my firm view is that the private life is one of the most essential civil rights and should be observed strictly. This essay will cover each side of the argument in turn.
First of all , safety and freedom from crimes is highly important for each citizen. There is a view that sometimes it is justified to step over human privacy to keep people safe. For example, reading messages between two criminals could help the police to prevent such a cruel acts as organized robbery or terrorist attack, which in turn could lead to loss of human life.
On the other hand, alternatively, there is no doubt that the privateness is necessary for any society. Any concept of happy life in a country has no sense without a person being able to decide whether to share an information with others or not, even in the name of national security. Moreover, intervention in private messages or emails can ruin human relationship and influence on personal reputation, which can destroy a life of people. For example, a person could lose his or her partner, if an unneeded information became known for everybody, which in turn could lead to suicide as a result of unhappy love. Evidently, breaking the initial human right of untouchability of private life in some cases could cause even worse consequences than rubbery.
To conclude, the accessibility of private information for a state in order to fight against crime is much contested topic these days. While others justify the right of a government to interfere personal emails or messages, my firm view is that the law of privacy must be obtained very precisely in the name of happy society.