A lot of people argee that replacing the builidings and which are old in cities by more modern buildings while others would argue that old architecture should be protected, In my opinion, it is the great idea that morden things will be build than the old.In the essay i will explain my opinion.
First of all, modern buildings are the appear of the countries.For example, the rank of the modern is always change day-by-day, every countries want to standing in the highest rank.The development country is which have the modest things in this.It also brings the value for our country like Landmark in Ho Chi Minh city, and also the other buildings.Every years, it attracted tourism too much, many people want to try somethings in this buiding.No one do not want to try new things.The more modern. the more attractive.Economic is also improved.
In contrast, modern will be a downside.Old buildings are also the heritage cultur of one country , the value of the past.Protecting it is also protected the traditional.Futhermore, the bulding in the past should be preserved carefull to new generation kwown about the past time.Hoi An , for instance, is the placed that cosidered to be the most crowded with the foreign tourist in Viet Nam.It is one of the beauty that we can not build like the past.
However, the time is passed, the quality of the building is also decreased , it can be dangerous for citizen.It should be replaced by the morden.Modern is also the value that we need.