🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Bar Chart

Band 5+: The chart below shows the percentage of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Image for topic: The chart below shows the percentage of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image shows a bar graph depicting the percentage of household waste recycled in a city across four categories (plastic, paper, glass, cans) for the years 1992, 1997, and 2002; for plastic: 1992 (2%), 1997 (6%), 2002 (8%); for paper: 1992 (15%), 1997 (20%), 2002 (38%); for glass: 1992 (12%), 1997 (15%), 2002 (48%); for cans: 1992 (10%), 1997 (17%), 2002 (28%).
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The bar graph presents the figure for some kinds of household waste which were recycled in a city over a period of 10 years, starting from 1992.

Overall, it is clear that the percentage of some types of household waste recycle increased over the period except that of cans. The figure for cans was highest in 1992, while in 2002 the highest percentage was glass.

In 1992, the statistics of Cans was the highest, at around 18%, while the figures for paper and glass were lower, at around 15% and 16% respectively. The data of plastic was the lowest in 1992, at 12%. In 1997, the proportion of Paper rose to more than 30%, which was the highest figure in that year, while that of Cans witnessed a decrease to below 15%. The percentages of glass and plastics developed to around 30% and 12% respectively.

In 2002, the figure for Glass increased by 20%, reaching a total of 50%, and got the top of figure for waste recycle. The percentage of Cans’ recycle increased back to the figure in 1992, at 18% while the data of paper developed to around 40% in 2002 . The figure for Glass remained unchanged from 1997 to 2002, at approximately 15%.

Word Count: 207

Answers On The Same Topic:

The chart below shows the percentage of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart highlights information about the percentage of household waste which were recycled over a ten-year period,from 1992 to 2002. Overall, what stands out from the chart is that glass was the biggest waste recycle throughout the period shown ; whereas, the minimal described in plastic. Another noticeable point is that there was a […]

The chart below shows the percentage of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart demonstrates how discent kinds of houshold waste-plastic, paper, glass and cans-were recycled in the specific city over a decade spanning 1992 to 2002. Overall, recycle of glass was the most significant, while plastic was recycled the least throughout the whole period. In addition, each type of waste were recycled the most in […]

The chart below shows the percentage of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Overall, it is clear that greater proportions of household waste of all types given were recycled over the 10 years period. It is also notable that paper and glass were the two most recycled materials in the two final years. In 1992, a similar percentage (15%) of paper and glass were recycled, but while the […]

The chart below shows the percentage of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart give information about the proportions of four types of recycled domestic waste, namely plastic, cans, paper, and glass between 1992 and 2002. Overall, the figures for household waste that was recycled in all categories experienced an upward trend. In addition, the most notable change was witnessed in the recycling rate of glass. […]

See All

Other Topics:

The charts below show the percentages of male and female students getting top grades in 1960 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The below chart presents information about the proportion of famele and male students getting top grades of various subjects over the period from 1960 and 2000. Overall, humanities showed the largest percentage for male while, art peresent the lowest proportion. Moreover, languages illustrated the higher proportion for famele. However, science had the lowest proportion. First […]

The chart below shows the percentage of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002

The line chart provides information regarding the proportions of four distinct types of recycled household waste in a particular city from 1992 to 2002. Overall, it is evident that with the exception of plastic, the other three types: paper, glass, and cans were recorded at nearly similar figures initially. However, glass was the most prevalent […]

The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line chart provides information regarding the proportions of four distinct recycled household waste in a particular city from 1992 to 2002. Overall, it is evident that with the exception of plastic, the other three types: paper, glass, and cans, were recorded at nearly similar figures initially. However, glass was the most prevalent type of […]

The chart below details the waste disposal in one European country between 2005 and 2008.

The bar chart provides information about the waste disposal (landfill, burning, and dumping at sea) in one European country between 2005 and 2008. Overall, the amount of landfill had the highest figure from 2005 to 2007, and decreased over the given period. In contrast, burning had the lowest amount from 2005 to 2006, but, showed […]

The given graph shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in 4 countries. Write a report for a university lecture making comparisons where relevant and reporting the main features.

The bar chart illustrates information about six different consumer goods, and the amount of money spent on them in four countries: Germany, Italy, France, and Britain. Units are measured in thousand pound sterling. Overall, Britain has spent the most, compared to other countries. While, Germany spent the least amount of pound sterling on most of […]

The graph shows the number of visitors to a variety of art galleries in 2011. Summarize the information by selecting and repo fling the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph demonstrates the attendance of the six world art galleries in 2011. Overall, the Louvre (France) dominated that year, while the State Hermitage in Russia had the lowest number of visitors. The gap between the most and least visited museums was significantly high. In more detail, the number of visitors to the Louvre reached […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.