🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Multiple Graphs

Band 8+: The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co - workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Image for topic: The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co - workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image contains two pie charts comparing relationships with co-workers for the years 2005 and 2009. In 2005, the distribution is: Very good: 63%, Good: 28%, Fair: 7%, Poor: 1%, Don't have co-workers: 1%. In 2009, the distribution is: Very good: 70%, Good: 25%, Fair: 3%, Don't have co-workers: 2%.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The two pie charts show the results of surveys conducted in 2005 and 2009 about workers’ relationships with their colleagues and supervisors, based on different information.

Overall, most employees had a good relationship with their supervisors and co-workers in both years.However, some workers felt unhappy and felt their relationship was unfair or poor.

Looking at the first chart, the percentage of workers reporting ‘very good’ relationships with supervisors increased from 61% to 65% between 2005 and 2009, while those reporting ‘good’ relationships decreased slightly approximately 4%. Some workers said their relationships were ‘fair’, accounting for 8% in 2005 and 6% in 2009. Moreover, the proportion of people reporting ‘no relationship’ with their supervisors rose considerably from 1% to 5%, and 2% reported they felt the relationship was ‘poor’ in 2009.

Regarding the relationships with co-workers, most people said they were ‘very good’, around 63% in 2005 and 70% in 2009. The percentage reporting ‘good’ relationships declined from 28% to 25%, and ‘fair’ relationships also decreased from 7% to 3%. Just 1% of people felt the relationship was ‘poor’ in 2005, and 2% reported not having co-workers in 2009.

Generally, it can be seen that workers’ relationships with their colleagues and supervisors have both positive and negative effects in working places, depending on how they experienced and reported them.

Word Count: 218

Answers On The Same Topic:

The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co – workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two pie charts shows the results of surveys done in 2005 and 2009 about how workers felt about their relationship with supervisors and co-workers. Overall, most people were quite happy in both years, but there were some small changes. In general, employees seemed to have a bit better connection with their colleagues than with […]

The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co – workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chartS illustrates the results of surveyS between 2005 and 2009 about workers’ relationships with their supervisors and co-workers in six different categories namely: do not have a supervisor, no answer, poor, fair, good and very good. Overall, it can be seen that the percentages of relationships with supervisors and co-workers at work the […]

The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co – workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two pie charts show the results of surveys conducted in 2005 and 2009 about workers’ relationships with their colleagues and supervisors, based on different information. Overall, the majority of employees had a good relationship with their supervisors and co-workers in both years. However, some workers felt unhappy and felt their relationship was unfair or […]

The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co – workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chart gives us information about the relationships between co-workers and with their supervisors in 2005 and 2009. Regarding relationships with supervisors, the figure for very good increased 61% to 65% from 2005 to 2009, while those with good relationships decreased slightly by 3%. Fewer people said their relationships were fair (between 8% and […]

See All

Other Topics:

The given line chart presents the number of people with different average working hours and the table show the average number of paid holidays by year.

The table and graph illustrates the average number of paid holidays by year and number of people with kinds average working hours in Uzbekiston between 1998 and 2004. Overall, the number of employees working under 45 hours increased, while the workforce category working longer hours declined. Concurrently, the average number of paid holidays rose steadily […]

The given line chart presents the number of people with different average working hours and the table show the average number of paid holidays by year.

The given line graph illustrates the number of people with various average working hours and the table shows the average number of paid holidays by year. Looking from overall perspective, there are two types of working hours, working less hours increased while working longer hours fall over the period.Consequently, the average number of paid holidays […]

The given line chart presents the number of people with different average working hours and the table show the average number of paid holidays by year.

The table and line graph illustrate average number of paid holiday and the number of humans with different average working hours [in millions] between 1998 and 2004. Looking from an overall perspective,it is readily apparent that people who work fewer increased steadily by 2004.In contrast, humans who work longer hours decreased by 2004.However, if we […]

Avarege minutes men and women spent on unpaid work and leisure activities.

Task 1. The given table chart illustrates the amount of time spent by men and women on recreational activities whereas the bas chart represents time spent on domestic chores. Overall, men and women spends maximum amount of their leisure time watching To on videos, while minimum can be seen true for sports. Whereas, they allocate […]

The graphs below show the percentage of students who studied for different amounts of time for s test and the average score students obtained based on hours studied.

The graphs below illustrates the rate of students that studied for various number of hours for an exam and the general score they got based on how much hours were spent for studying. According to the pie chart, it’s clear that the majority of students which is at 38% spent 51 to 75 hours for […]

The charts below show the distribution of the world's water and the use of water in three countries.

The charts illustrate the distribution of the world’s water and compare water usage in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Canada. Overall, most of the world’s water is salt water, while only a very small proportion is fresh water. In addition, agriculture is the main use of water in Egypt and Saudi Arabia, whereas industry consumes the […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.