The table given compares the percentage of first year students who rated differents aspects there courses as “very good” across three disciplines: Commerce, Law and Economics.
Looking at the illustration, it is immediately evident that Commerce students were the most satisfied with their course resources, whereas Economics students had the lowesr ratings in most categories. Additionally, while Commerce students rated tutors, teaching methods, and pre-course information highly, they rated print resources and other resources slightly lower.
In the first category,Comerce students showed the highest level of satisfaction, with an average of 94% rating their pre-course information, teaching,and tutor as very good. Additionally, just over 80% of them found the printed resources and other resource to be of a very good standard. In contrast, despite some fluctuations, Economics students had the lowest satisfacstion levels. Only 60% of them rated thir tutor and other resources as very good.The figures for teaching and printed resources were slightly lower, at around 55%, while pre-course information receive the lowest rating, at just 45%.
Meanwhile, around 70% of law students rated their printed materials, tutors and pre-course information as vary good. However, only 62% rated the teaching as good, while 80% rated other materials highly