The given table compares how much percent of students who gave good feedback for five different features in a university in China in three years 2000,2005 and 2010.
It is clear that the percentage of people evaluating good ratings for range of modules offered decreased slowly in those years, the opposite was true the remains. Additionally, print resource was rated the best aspect.
As can be seen from the chart, at the beginning, print resource had the highest good voting with 87%, which was higher than the percentage of students giving good votings for technical quality and elctronic resources with 63% and 45% respectively. Over the period of ten years from 2000, the figure for print resources consistently received the largest good ratings (about 95%) before decreasing subtantially to 91% in the last year. Similarly, there was a stability in technical quality and then increased significantly to 69%, whereas the ratings for electronic resources stood at 89% in 2010, which was twice as much as that of 2000.
It is conspicuous that most of people undervalued ramge of modules offered, which accounted for 33% in the year 2000, while building and teaching facilities was the second highest positive rating ( around 75%). In the next ten years, the figure for range of modules offered declined considerably to 26% at the end of the period. In contrast, the votings of the building and teaching facilities remained stable at 75% in during the given period.