The tabular format delves into the results of the 2012 survey of various feedbacks from club members and public in general, pertaining to facilities, information, and quality, with a view to developing the new theatre in one small city.
Generally, it is conspicuous that more than half of the proportion of interviewees in the questionnaire felt excellent at each respect of the theatre. In addition, most of the participants had poorer opinions about information than the rest.
Initially, examining data of facilities, the extremely satisfied surveyed subjects accounted for relatively three-fourth of the club members, but only 64% of the general public. What’s more, the latter experiencing a sense of satisfaction was chronicled at 8%, which was four times higher than the former.
Looking at the information, while 66% of club members considered it in an excellent state, a lower number of 54% taken from public perspectives. Moreover, the percentage of positive answers held nearly one-fourth of all participants.
In the last category, respondents grading the quality as remarkably good accounted for the highest proportion of 88% of the data collected from club members but around half of the rest, whereas the last cohort accounted for 10% of club members, a figure quartering that of the general public.