🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Table

Band 5+: The table shows the results of a survey in 2004 which asked undergraduate and f postgraduate students of a UK university whether they were satisfied with the facilities at the university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Image for topic: The table shows the results of a survey in 2004 which asked undergraduate and f postgraduate students of a UK university whether they were satisfied with the facilities at the university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image shows that, for study facilities in bedrooms, 65% of postgraduate students were very satisfied, 20% quite satisfied, and 15% not at all satisfied, while 67% of undergraduate students were very satisfied, 17% quite satisfied, and 26% not at all satisfied; for the university cafeteria, 52% of postgraduate students were very satisfied, 32% quite satisfied, and 16% not at all satisfied, compared to 50% of undergraduate students being very satisfied, 27% quite satisfied, and 23% not at all satisfied; for social facilities, 80% of postgraduate students were very satisfied, 15% quite satisfied, and 5% not at all satisfied, with undergraduate students showing 45% very satisfied, 25% quite satisfied, and 30% not at all satisfied.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The diagram illustrates the percentage of two types of students, namely: undergraduate and postgraduate students at a university in the UK, who were comfortable with the three infrastructures there in 2004.

Overall, while postgraduate students show more interest in social facilities, it is also noticeable that undergraduate students are big fans of the University cafeteria.

Regarding study facilities in bedrooms, both groups had similar levels of excitement in the research; the percentage of postgraduate students who were extremely excited was 2% lower than that of undergraduate students, at 65% and 67%, respectively. Similarly, the proportion of undergraduate students who were quite satisfied was 17%, which was 3% lower than the figure for postgraduate students. Moreover, 15% and 26% expressed displeasure about this service for postgraduate and undergraduate students in the survey.

On the other hand, in terms of the university cafeteria, half of both student groups, namely postgraduate and undergraduate students, were excited about this infrastructure, at 52% and 70%, respectively. Although, only 3% and 16% of postgraduate and undergraduate students were dissatified with this service, respectively. Regarding social facilities, postgraduate students who were excited about this service were 95%, and only 5% of them showed their displeasure with this service in the survey. Moreover, the proportion of undergraduate students who were disappointed was one-third, and 70% of undergraduate students were excited about this service.

Word Count: 225

Answers On The Same Topic:

The table shows the results of a survey in 2004 which asked undergraduate and f postgraduate students of a UK university whether they were satisfied with the facilities at the university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the level of satisfaction of undergraduate and postgraduate students with three different facilities, namely study facilities in the bedroom, university cafeteria, and social facilities at a UK university, based on a survey conducted in 2004. Overall, undergraduate students were more satisfied with most facilities at the university, while the percentage of these […]

The table shows the results of a survey in 2004 which asked undergraduate and f postgraduate students of a UK university whether they were satisfied with the facilities at the university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the results of a survey conducted in 2004 among undergraduate and postgraduate students at a UK university, focusing on their level of satisfaction with university facilities. Overall, postgraduate students were generally more satisfied than undergraduates, particularly with social facilities. In contrast, undergraduate students expressed the highest level of satisfaction with the university […]

The table shows the results of a survey in 2004 which asked undergraduate and f postgraduate students of a UK university whether they were satisfied with the facilities at the university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrate the outcome of survey held on 2004 of undergraduate and postgraduate students of a UK university about there satisfaction regarding the facilities provided by university. Overall , there where three areas which measure the satisfaction level of students . They were study facilities in bedroom, univeristy cafeteria and social facilities however the […]

The table shows the results of a survey in 2004 which asked undergraduate and f postgraduate students of a UK university whether they were satisfied with the facilities at the university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the percentage of both undergraduate and postgraduate students’ satisfaction about the university’s amenities through a survey handled at a UK university in 2004. Overall, postgraduate students expressed the greatest satisfaction with social facilities while undergraduate students were content with the university cafeteria. In general, most students were satisfied with university facilities. In […]

The table shows the results of a survey in 2004 which asked undergraduate and f postgraduate students of a UK university whether they were satisfied with the facilities at the university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given table delineates how undergraduate and postgraduate students satisfied with different facilities at the univeristy in 2004. Overall, it is readily apparent that most students highly contended with the facilities because the proportion for all categories above 50%, except for the social facilities due to the viewpoint of undergraduate students. Notably, the most radically […]

See All

Other Topics:

The table below shows water use for different purposes in four countries. The use of water by four different countries (%) Country Domestic use Industry Agriculture Egypt 8 10 82 Saudi Arabia 6 30 64 New Zealand 10 46 44 Canada 20 70 10

UThe table below shows water use for different purposes in four countries. The table illustrates information about the consumption of water for various purposes in four countries such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, New Zealand and Canada. Overall, it is also clear that In Domestic use has many low consumptions in each nations. Whereas Industry and […]

The table shows the position of women in governmnets and management in 2000 in 5 countries

The statistical board compares the proportions of women holding seats and managing positions in five different countries in 2000. Overall, women were more strongly respresented in management than in parliament in every country. Norway had the highest proportion of female parliamentarians, while Italy recorded the largest share of women in management despite having one of […]

the table below shows the persentage of household spending on five different categories in three countries in 2010

The picture provides information about the percentage of household spending in different three countries in 2010. Overall, the data is presented several spending categories: food, housing, transportation, education, and entertainment. The picture is shown that every country accounted for the different percentage on five types of spending. On the one hand, the highest food spending, […]

The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA,EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010(figures are in millions of dollars)

The table show the amount of money which was given to developing countries by the USA, EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010, in millions of dollars. Overall, USA gave the biggest amount of money in all years. Also, the total number mostly increased during the period, but in 2009 it decreased a […]

The table below shows the number of people working different jobs in one country in 2015 and 2025, and its projected changes

The supplied tabular data depicts the number of individuals working distinct positions in one specific country from 2015 to 2025, along with the projected percentage changes over the period. From an overall perspective, it is evident that all occupations are expected to experience growth expect cleaners, whose employment figures are projected to declined slightly. Professors […]

The table shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000, 2005, 2010.

This table chart compares percentage of student giving rating in several aspect at unversity in china between 2000 and 20010. Based on the chart, in 2000, 63% of students give good ratings at technical quality and remain the same for 5 years, and it increased to 69% of students rating by 2010. Following that, print […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.