There has been an ongoing debate over whether the current college entrance examination should be eliminated completely. Many parents and learners contend that this system is outdated and overly stressful. From my point of view, I personally disagree with this opinion as it plays a crucial role in assessing the academic ability of students.
On the one hand, it is undeniable this current system has negative effects on students. The primary disadvantage of entrance examination is that it exerts excessive pressure on learners, which leads to disastrous consequences. Obviously, the intensive competition associated with these exams causes students to put more effort into increasing their chances of getting into dream universities. However, excessive tension can lead them to experience mental issues, such as anxiety and depression. There have been numerous instances of suicide due to academic pressure. Furthermore, these exams can limit their opportunities to develop important skills. Evidently, this pressure forces them to focus solely on exam preparation, overlooking other vital aspects of education, such as creativity, and social skill sets. In this sense, the examination system can be seen as limiting, since as encourages exam-driven education rather than fostering a well-rounded one.
On the other hand, despite these drawbacks, the entrance exam also brings several advantages to learners. First and foremost, it remains an essential tool for evaluating students’ academic capabilities.
Undoubtedly, it serves as a measure that can be used to compare students from different schools and regions. Without these exams, many universities may struggle to assess the academic potential of applicants fairly and consistently. Secondly, abolishing the current examination system without a viable alternative could lead to greater disparities in university admissions. For example, if admissions were based solely on interviews, extracurricular activities, or other subjective criteria, wealthier students might have an even greater advantage, as they often have more opportunities to excel in these areas. This adversely impacts the chances of matriculation of students who come from underprivileged backgrounds compared to affluent candidates.
In conclusion, despite the fact that the current entrance examination may have its disadvantages, it should not be eradicated as it still serves an important purpose in ensuring fairness and consistency in university admissions. Rather than abolishing the system entirely, efforts should be made to reform it, reducing stress on students while still maintaining its role as a key measure of academic ability.