Computers have sparked debates over its necessity in education. It is argued that the more they are utilised in the classroom, the higher the possibility that they will replace teachers would be. Personally, I take issue with that perception.
Admittedly, computers do create numerous positive impacts on the learning process. The most striking one is its facilitation of knowledge acquisition. On the grounds that a lesson, with the assistance of these devices, is vividly illustrated, it becomes accessible to students, which paves the way for rapidly grasping key concepts and, in turn, saving time. Furthermore, without these electronic devices, students would be incapable of conducting research for further information. This would give rise to the implication that they could not explore what remains mysterious or curious, gain deeper comprehension of a specific topic, and in the worst scenario, improve their exam marks as a result.
Nevertheless, I believe that the roles of teachers outweigh those aforementioned functions. To begin with, teachers are likely to closely monitor students’ progress. Not only can they provide detailed guidance or explanation for each inquiry, but they also offer personalised approaches and plans to enhance academic performances. It is evident that individuals can use their computers to look for instructions, yet what is given on the Internet is always fixed, which might not apply to all cases. In addition to this, it is teachers that are professionally trained to help learners tackle mental problems arising from their learning process. Unlike computers, which are merely a physical object, teachers do possess emotional intelligence and are eligible for addressing issues, namely depression, several types of disorder, and so forth. Thus, the paramount importance of teachers is proven to be superior to computers.
In conclusion, while the influence of computers in education is undeniable, from my point of view, the role of teachers remains predominant and essential.