The issue of whether to allocate substantial financial resources to constructing new railway lines for high-speed trains between cities or to enhance the existing public transport system is a topic of ongoing debate. While some advocate for the latter perspective, I contend that there are compelling reasons to support the former idea.
On one hand, there are several advantages to allocating government funds to improve public transport such as buses. Initially, the fare for using these modes of transport is affordable, and the booking process is simple, making it accessible to students and the elderly without barriers. Moreover, the use of public transport can contribute to a reduction in gas emissions, leading to the development of an environmentally friendly transportation system.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that investing in high-speed rail systems, which reduce travel time, offers numerous benefits. By utilizing a dedicated line, these trains can help alleviate traffic congestion. Additionally, passengers can enjoy high-quality amenities and significantly reduce travel time between cities over long distances, thereby creating more job opportunities in modern urban areas and facilitating commuting for individuals who work far from their residences. Notably, many developed countries have shown a clear inclination towards developing high-speed train networks linking their cities, as exemplified by the Shinkansen in Japan and the international rail link between Laos and China.
In conclusion, while both perspectives have their merits, it is evident to me that a developed country requires an effective, long-term investment strategy in modern transportation systems such as high-speed trains that connect cities.