In recent years, an increasing number of people living in large cities have chosen to live alone or in small family units rather than as part of large extended families. I believe this trend is largely positive, and the reasons for this view will be discussed below.
One major advantage of this trend is that it allows individuals to rebuild their identities independently of their family background. With the development of social media and public welfare systems such as basic medical insurance, urban residents are less dependent on family support in their daily lives and are therefore able to focus more on romantic relationships, friendships, and personal fulfillment.
In addition, traditional extended families are often based on fixed social roles and obligations, whereas modern urban life encourages more flexible forms of kinship. For many people, family is no longer viewed as the ultimate destination of life, but as one of several meaningful social connections. Living alone or in a small family also reduces financial pressure, enabling individuals to invest more resources in improving their quality of life.
Admittedly, some people argue that this trend may weaken family relationships and lead to social problems in large cities, such as loneliness, mental health issues, or increased individualism. However, these problems cannot simply be solved by maintaining large family structures or by appealing to traditional notions of family love. Social challenges in modern cities require broader solutions, including psychological support systems and inclusive social networks, rather than a return to extended family living.
In conclusion, although this social phenomenon challenges traditional views of family, it reflects the evolving nature of kinship in modern society. Living alone or in small family units offers individuals greater autonomy and flexibility, which can be seen as a positive development in the context of contemporary urban life.