Some urban areas have situated mandatory local services which are allocated for residents remote from each other. Although it has myriad of benefits, such as better urban organisation and reduced conflict between different land uses, the longer commuting times and increased traffic congestions and pollution led to surpassing of demerits.
One primary merit of this accommodation is efficient positioning of each service because separating urban functions allows authorities to manage infrastructure more efficiently and provide services in an organised manner. To illustrate, if residential areas are set up in the same way, commercial zones will attract businesses and educational institutions will be established nearby; therefore, it will be a straightforward approach to organise infrastructure and public transports. Moreover, zoning policies contribute to diminishing rifts between residential and commercial activities as inconveniences, such as posing threat to children by industrial installations from commercial properties will not disturb residents. However, these aspects do not outweigh drawbacks due to the fact that it has far-reaching repercussions, which affect daily life of residents.
One of the problems associated with separating residential, educational and commercial zones is longer commuting time. Individuals will spend an abundance of their time solely for commuting, thereby restricting their schedule. As a result of tight-schedule, they will not spend quality time with their families and leisure timesheets , leading to stress. Furthermore, not only does longer commuting contribute to stress, but also it fosters an increased carbon emissions. As residents have to frequently rely on private vehicles so that abundance of emissions from transports creates pollution.
In conclusion, in light of the aforementioned arguments, the downsides of this trend far exceed the positives because short-term conveniences will not prevent substantial implications. Planners must consider far reaching consequences.