In several nations, students are required to pay for their college or university courses, while the expenses of colleges or universities are fully paid by governments. From my perspective, I firmly believe that the advantages of this phenomenon outweigh the negative ones.
In terms of disadvantages, several underdeveloped countries are unable to support the fees of higher educational courses for students. As these coutries need to face numerous economic problems, the governmental resources are allocated to these issues with the aim of diminishing the adverse effects. If they channel their national budgets into supporting full scholarships for students, these mentioned problems will be unable to addressed thoroughly. This, in turn, poses challenges on the governments, which affects other critical aspects of these nations. In unforeseen situations, the dissatisfaction of citizens potentially occurs, as they cannot receive the supports of authorities, which have been distributed to education.
However, regarding benefits, it is apparent that the merits of distributing governmental budgets to support college or university students influence positively on the enhancements of countries. In the ongoing time, a significant number of students face hardships on studying albeit their outstanding studying background; therefore, channelling national resources on these students can engender valuable workforce in the long term. These students can be delegated to work crucial tasks, assisting governments with enhancing the nations. For instance, in the USA, many prestigous universities, such as Stanford and Havard, tend to implement supporting policies for poor students, thereby facilitating their studying.
In conclusion, as mentioned earlier, I firmly believe that the advantages of providing resources for students outweigh the negative ones. Therefore, governments should encourage students to relentlessly strive for their studying success, assisting them with the development of countries.