It is true that in many areas, fields and public parks are replaced by accommodation buildings. While some view it as beneficial, others argue that it brings negative consequences. This essay will delve into both positive and negative outcomes.
There are several reasons why parls and farmlands transfer into housing development. The first cause is that as cities grow and the population rises, the demand for accommodation and apartment blocks increases. By using free land for housing, cities can accommodates more residents and provide affordable housing options. As a result, the government will gain profit from selling them to inhabitants, who need accommodations, and also prevent population congestion.
On the other hand, modifying natural places into housing also has negative effects on the environment and community well-being. Parks and farmlands provide many benefits such as fresh air and peaceful space. Destroying these areas can lead to negative consequences. For instance, it leads to an increase in pollution, reduces air quality, and there will not be places for outdoor activities.
In conclusion, the conversion of parks and farmlands into council estates presents both negative and positive impacts, however I believe that new housing areas in the cities are negative development and will damage the nature, also public condition.