The traditional method of ‘paper and pen’ examination is commonly used in many countries. However, societal changes resulting from the growth of human knowledge have led to claims that the formal ‘pen and paper’ test may no longer be the most effective method for assessing students’ skills and knowledge. I personally agree with this viewpoint.
It is evident that formal examinations have some inherent disadvantages. Firstly, there is a significant cost involved in printing materials, and post-examination, these papers often contribute to waste that harms the environment. Secondly, being an old method, ‘paper and pen’ exams make it easier for students to find numerous ways to cheat, leading to unfair advantages for those who prepare legitimately and lowering the test’s quality.
In addition to traditional methods of evaluating educational progress, alternative approaches such as interview tests or computer-based assessments can provide a more secure way to assess students’ capabilities. These new methods can be more difficult to manipulate as students are less likely to understand their workings fully. Employing appropriate assessment techniques can assist examiners in discerning students’ strengths and weaknesses.
While it may be argued that ‘paper and pen’ examinations are still relevant, there is a need to evolve how students are evaluated in recognition of the substantial changes in the world. Given the limitations of traditional exams, it is essential to explore more effective methods for assessing students’ knowledge and skills.