By cultivating various plants, people can receive a lot of benefits, so there is an opinion that the public should switch from constructing buildings to greening. Although this way can has significant contributions to nature, I do not agree with this statement since this method does not fit the current times because of direct issues which also exist, as well as the public having some alternative approaches.
On the one hand, a large numbers of trees can be useful for the public in some cases. Since they absorb carbon and release oxygen, which is necessary for people and creatures’ existence, it has potential benefits for clean state of environment. The quality of air is crucial for avoiding some adverse climate changes. Additionally, cultivation can assist with saving biodiversity, as woods are the natural habitat for animals and other species. For instance, in some towns, administrations decides to create special separate territories with the variety of plants, which are defended from public, maintaining nature-friendly surroundings.
On the other hand, I think that this approach cannot be relevant in conditions in which humanity is existing now, and they can try to mix planting and building. In the resent years, people faced with overpopulation, as they need for available buildings for living so governments are spending money, expanding areas for foundations. Moreover, the public has many resourses to increase the number of plants regardless of the presence of buildings. For example, in South Korea some companies use method of installing trees on cover areas of buildings, therefore greening these zones.
In conclusion, despite planting having an actual meaning for nature, I believe that the population should not replace buildings with trees. I find this reasonable for people to try to combine both building and cultivating,