Some individuals suggest that tackling pollution is primarily the responsibility of national governments. Nevertheless, others believe that the responsibility for solving this problem belongs to everyone. In this essay, I will evaluate both perspectiveefore arguing that reducing emissions requires contributions from both governments and individuals.
On the one hand, governments play a crucial role in reducing pollution due to their financial resources and authority. Firstly, the government has to invest in development and production of electric vehicles, significantly reducing the exhaust fumes, which requires significant time and effort. Furthermore, the central government also has some suitable policices to subsidise the citizens buying the eco-friendly vehicles to make them more affordable. Therefore, only the authorities may implement this process and bring clear environmental benefits on the society. For example, Norway offers generous subsidies and tax exemptions for electric vehicles, leading to over 80% of new cars being electric.
On the other hand, individuals also play an important role in reducing pollution through their transport choices. While increasing consumerism has led to a higher demand for delivery services, the main issue lies in the excessive use of private vehicles. Therefore, people should reduce their reliance on cars by using public transport such as buses and trains. Additionally, individuals should be encouraged to adopt environmentally friendly habits, including purchasing electric vehicles instead of diesel-powered ones. As a result, these actions can significantly reduce overall emissions.
In conclusion, although there are mixed opinions on determining whether governments or individuals should be responsible for resolving the problem of pollution, I believe that striking a balance would be the best approach. While national governments have ability to implement comprehensive solutions and radical measures to address this issue effectively, each person’s awareness is also very significant and may bring profound benefits for the environment.