Many people think that the crime can not be stopped only by human judgement, while others say that science is more effective to stop it. I would say that it is totally right because science is developed by evidence based and research than human judgement in stopping the illegal action
Science is developed by evidence base that is why science more reasonable to create a regulation instead of stopping crime. Even though people think that evidence base comes from human, we can choose many examples and more dynamic circumstance by science. In the science, there is nothing personal, not represent only a group of people but it covers many aspects. For example, when the government discuss to legalize regulation for crime, they need to classify first what are the actions which categorized as a crime by science methodology and show the evidence based why the action is a part of crime. Evidence base method on science will define clearly what are the fit regulation to stop crime and what is best solution to stop it. If the regulation does not proper the community will against it, moreover; the crime will
In addition to that, why science is more effective it is because science is not only base on the opinion but also base on research. Research will show the result and the result can be used as a foundation to create a regulation in terms of reducing the illegal act. As a result, the punishment will consider many aspects. For instance, when the government decide what is the best punishment for corruptor to eradicate the corruption case, many people said that they should be killed off because they contributed to the high number of poverty. However, by science, we can do research the real connection between poverty and corruption impact. It is impact directly, it is the main problem or it is just assumption? The research will show the result. If it is yes, the kill the corruptor probably is the best way to stop corruption, unless the decision will be
In conclusion, human judgement is not effective to stop crime because it is potentially have a personal interest and it is not base on the research and fact. Meanwhile science is more reasonable because it runs by evidence base and research before. We can stop crime if the regulation is proper in terms the punishment and also logical evidence otherwise instead of stop the crime the unproper regulation by human right will create more