Stating that poor living people are more tend to commit crimes may not be correct, because it’s unproven.Supporters of this idea think that comitted crimes depend only on individuals’ intentions and there is no influence from life quality.
On one hand,many people might agree with this perspective.Because there are a lot of people living low life who had proven their respectfulness to the laws and still standing on their principles,not comitting any crimes or law-breakings.I could have agreed with this believing too,if i hadn’t been such a realistic person.However,if completed crime has been associated with violence,there’s no excuses and no one can justify it so easy.
Because, on the other hand,location where do people live and how do they live may affect on their behavior.There is not need to prove that poor living person for instance,more likely to commit a robbery,whereas wealthy people just don’t need to do it for obvious reasons.The major proportion of comitted thefts have been done due to hopelessness.But, when people from poor living areas starting to affiliate and create organised criminal groups with the purpose of profit,it gets out of the hand and goes beyond of all inappropriate and appropriate limits.
To conclude I will state my opinion,in order to evaluate crimes by the fact were they commited because of bad intentions or not.We have to get access to more advanced information about crime that had been commited,whether it was murder or unintentional car-accident.That’s how we can consider crimes without prejudice based only on level of people’s living.