In numerous countries, people believe that education and healthcare should be free. However, there are contentions that the people themselves should pay these fees. This essay will discuss both views and why the fees for education and healthcare should be the people’s responsibility.
To commence, the predominant advantage of having the government pay for your education and healthcare fees is that you can avoid situations where you do not have sufficient money in your bank at that moment. This is typically seen in the US, where people often use credit cards, and pay them off at the end of every month. Subsequently, people would not be likely to have enough money to pay for a sudden accident and, therefore end up with a significant need for free health care. In the case of education, this is often expected in most countries in recent days. Most people consider funding students’ schooling as the government’s responsibility to develop the next generations of the country. Furthermore, offering to pay the fees for education and healthcare will attract many people to move to the country. Subsequently, as the population increases, the need for jobs will also grow exponentially. This is extremely beneficial for companies and therefore inspires competition and evolution.
Conversely, people who think that it should be the people’s job to pay for these fees argue that the parents should take care of their children’s learning, not anyone else. Although families with financial difficulties can have tuition fees partially funded, it is still primarily the people’s job to work hard in order to get their children a better education, not solely relying on the government. For healthcare, although the government should take responsibility for bolstering people’s lives, it is considered a better option to reduce taxes rather than pay the fees directly. To elucidate, lowering the tax means giving people an amount of money based on their income, which would encourage people to work and generate more money, therefore significantly strengthening the economy and further developing the country. Moreover, many people prefer to manage their expenses their way. They might want to pay less to hospitals and instead use the money to buy something else.
In conclusion, the government should indeed be responsible for the living quality of the people. However, there are numerous ways to accomplish that, and funding people’s healthcare and education fees should not be prioritized over other solutions. Instead of directly providing financial assets to people, governments can consider a tax decrement, which would profit the country in many other ways, as long as the situation is controllable.