It is believed by some that everyone should have free healthcare facilities, while others argue that medical treatments should be purchased by cost. I think there are some cases when free treatments are necessary; however, individuals should take responsibility for their health.
By implementing free healthcare facilities, more people can live without any health concerns, as treatment becomes much more accessible. Moreover, low-income fraction of families have opportunity for receiving treatment, especially when they have severe illness. So, universal healthcare ensures that everyone, regardless of income, can receive essential medical services. For example, the UK’s national Health Service (NHS) provides free healthcare to all residents, reducing health disparities. But, free medical services can lead to shortage of resources and prolonged queue to cure.
On the other hand, medical treatment should cost deserved price and individuals should take responsibility for their health. Furthermore, it promotes healthy lifestyles, since individuals are stimulated to adopt healthier habits to avoid medical expenses when they bear some cost of their healthcare. For example, Singapore’s co-payment healthcare model encourages residents to maintain good health while still supporting essential care. In addition, paid healthcare systems prevents resource crisis, unlike free systems which often overburdened by people seeking unnecessary treatment.
In conclusion, although free medical services provide equity and accessibility for individuals, they have problems with system abuse, while paid healthcare services encourages people to take responsibility and to lead a healthy lifestyle, preventing system abuse.