Several individuals agree that prisoners should have a longer period of incarceration in order to reduce the crime rate, while others assert that there are some measures which can effectively alter prison sentences. This essay will discuss both of these viewpoints and argue in favour of the latter.
On the one hand, supporters of longer imprisonment point out that it has an ability to reduce the intention of carrying out a crime. Prisons who are incarcerated will be examples of consequences of committing a crime, creating a fear which deter other people from carrying out a crime. Moreover, a long period of time will provide a chance for criminals to improve their rehabilitation progress , which assures them a stable future when coming back to society, mitigating the potential of re-offending. To sum up, longer prison sentences can provide more time for offenders to improve themself and be ready to return to the community.
On the other hand, opponents of longer imprisonment believe that other remedies can be implemented instead of prison sentences. Firstly, they should be allowed to engage in educational programmes such as moral classes and vocational training. This not only changes their detrimental mindsets but also equips them with useful skills for a wide range of jobs, guaranteeing a better future with stable job and stable income and navigating them not to participate in illegal activities again. Furthermore, prisoners should have opportunities to contribute in community service, and those who are diligent at work should have their imprisonment time decreased, which can facilitate their rehabilitation.
In conclusion, while longer prison sentences bring some merits, other measures such as educational programmes should be prioritised because of their better impact on reducing crime rate.