Normally, there are a lot of buildings and heavy traffics in urban areas, and people are busy with working or studying. While some people believe that parks in cities are important, others argue that the land should be used for another commercial purpose. This essay will examine this opinion and present my opinion.
On the one hand, I believe that public accessible parks play a significant role in maintaining people’s health. Public parks have many trees which supplies fresh air and calm feelings. People who work in the city are busy with chores, and they need relaxation place to refresh their physical and mental tiredness. Moreover, parks work as communal place to socialize with others. For example, dog owners come and see at parks with same purpose, and they get to know each others by spending time together. As a result, parks offer not only relaxation but also helping socializing.
On the other hand, I think that the land in cities should be kept as parks because parks can be applied for multiple purpose. If people need an exercise, parks can supply training facilities or running course which are reasonable for users and supply good training opportunities. Also, public space can be used as event space. For instance, organising concerts or food events in the park are common idea to promote the tourism. Parks located in the city have a good access and surrounded by the convenient environment. Consequently, public parks foster people’s overall satisfaction and serve precious experiences at just around corner of the city, so it cannot be replaced by commercial buildings.
In conclusion, public parks have a huge potential to enhance city life happiness. As the place have huge space, people can enjoy nature, socializing or outside events. Therefore, parks is important for city life.