It is claimed by some that a reading habit’s benefits rely on what kind of books people are reading, despite the common belief of its inherent value. Personally, I align myself with this perspective, but I also believe that in some instances the type of individual plays a more pivotal role than books themselves.
It is undeniable that reading is generally a good habit. Since ancient times, reading has been highly valued because it enhances concentration and cultivates patience, as it requires focus and sustained attention over extended periods. Moreover, modern research shows that individuals who engaged in reading may be less likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease compared to those who spend their leisure time on less stimulating activities.
Nevertheless, some oppose this fact, claiming that these advantages are significantly dependent on the right choice of the book. They believe that the book which is not interesting to the reader may not capture the attention to concentrate on the reading. As a result, this approach is potential to waste time without benefiting.
In my opinion, the aforementioned advantages not only depend on the type of book but also on the human. There are people who struggle to read, and for them, forcing them to read may not yield the desired benefits. Instead of forcing them to read, it might be more beneficial to explore alternative ways for them to engage with information and stories, recognizing that the challenge lies not with the books themselves but with finding the right approach for each individual.
In conclusion, I firmly understand that the type of books and people both determine whether a reader reaps the reading’s goods or not.