Among the various viewpoints on violence on social media, one widely accepted perspective is that television and computer games have no detrimental impact on humanity. Personally, I agree with this notion and believe that, in most cases, media violence does not influence people’s behavior.
First and foremost, there are plenty of cases to consider where strong images are believed to be a major contributor to someone’s aggressive behavior, as they act based on their motives regardless of what they see on television. In other words, if people intend to harm somebody, it is not because of watching TV or playing computer games, but due to their own characteristics and upbringing. While it is generally assumed that violent media shape people’s thoughts and encourage them to be cruel, I question this opinion. People, if they are rational and intelligent enough, can discern right from wrong and treat others with kindness despite what they see or hear in fictional stories.
To mitigate these negative effects, cooperation between authorities and parents is essential, especially in the case of children who may not be able to distinguish between good and bad influences. Firstly, authorities should restrict certain videos containing violent content on all commonly visited platforms. Additionally, it is crucial to provide education from early childhood to adulthood and for educational institutions to incorporate more lessons aimed at reducing aggression and promoting a calmer demeanor in individuals. As for parental figures, they play a vital role in their children’s education. Parents should select healthy programming and not overly indulge their children, thus minimizing the risk of exposing them to inappropriate content prematurely.
In conclusion, while many individuals believe that violence on social media has had a detrimental impact on society, I firmly believe that people’s behavior is primarily shaped by their upbringing and not necessarily by their interactions on social networks.