It is obvious that criminals should be punished to repay for their illegal actions. However, how we determine the verdicts in each case is a controversial issue. Some people believe that each type of crime should have a fixed punishment, while others believe that the circumstances leading to the violation should be taken into account when determining the retribution. Both perspectives have their own view and it is important to consider them carefully depending on the circumstances of the crime.
On one hand, fixed punishments for each type of crime bring fairness to the legal system. When everyone who commits the same crime receives the same sentence, it brings equality to the judgment process. This system ensures that wrongdoers are treated equally, regardless of their social status or background. Furthermore, predetermined punishments pose a strong deterrent effect, as would-be criminals will know exactly the consequences they will face if they violate the law. For example, if someone knows that stealing will always result in a five-year prison sentence, they may be less likely to steal or give up the idea.
On the other hand, sticking to the same punishment for all cases of a particular crime fails to consider the motivation that may have influenced a person’s actions. We cannot deny that emotions or external factors can be the primary contribution to one’s action rather than their pure intention. For example, a person who steals to take care of his family will be in a very different situation than someone who steals out of greed. In such cases, taking into account the individual’s circumstances to explain their actions can result in a fairer and more humane outcome, especially in cases where the culprits used to be the victims. Furthermore, flexible verdicts allow judges to consider mitigating factors, such as mental health issues or someone being pressed by another to commit a crime, which can result in a more appropriate and acceptable sentence.
In conclusion, while fixed penalties can significantly prevent crime, considering external factors can help the offender reduce their punishment and prove the humane aspects of the law system Therefore, although fixed punishment provides fairness and deterrence, it is essential to consider the motivation and scenarios of the offender to ensure that the punishment is truly fair both legally and morally.