People have different views about whether violent films should be banned or only regulate the level of violence. Although it can be argued that violent films should not be released, I believe that should only regulate the level of violence in films on television and cinema.
On the one hand, it is argued by some that violent films should not be regulated. This is because they believe the risks associated with that content are too great to release it. Violent scenes can greatly affect the thoughts and actions of viewers, especially children. It often leaves an impression on the viewer, and it is likely that they will imitate those fierce actions. Therefore, banning harsh films aims to any potential negative impact on viewers and maintain a healthier entertainment environment for all. However, the majority of people are able to clearly distinguish between real and virtual life, and banning vicious movies is excessive
On the other hand, violent films are a form of entertainment for a part of audiences and therefore, should not be prohibited. These viewers find joy from the thrill and excitement offered by harsh elements in movies, so forbidding their hobbies for the sake of a minority of audiences equals practicing
Injustice upon these individuals. Furthermore, without actions, movie makers will lack a key ingredient in building films’ charms. Nowadays, 90% of movies are sprinkled with violence, as even the slightest form of physical conflicts can be considered vicious. Consequently, filtering savage elements will be a
In conclusion, although there are reasonable arguments as to why violent films must be banned, the best solution is to regulate violent contents based on their levels.