People have differing opinions on whether violence in films should be regulated. While some argue that restricting the level of violence is unnecessary, I firmly believe that the government should monitor violent scenes.
On one hand, it is understandable why certain brutal elements are freely included in films. Firstly, some viewers find enjoyment and excitement in watching violent content, which has a positive impact on their mental health. As a result, these violent elements help them relax and become more motivated, leading to higher work productivity. Furthermore, filmmakers often incorporate acts of cruelty into their movies because they believe these elements significantly contribute to the success of blockbuster films. Without violence, the plot could become boring, resulting in lower viewership.
On the other hand, I firmly argue that the government should regulate the level of brutality in films, despite the aforementioned benefits of freely incorporating violence. Firstly, without careful censorship of violence, films can negatively impact the viewers’ conscience, especially children who have not yet fully developed their understanding. As a result, students may imitate the actions in films, unintentionally contributing to the rise of school violence. Secondly, for adults, the popularity of main antagonists can lead to the misconception that antisocial behavior is encouraged; thus, some individuals may follow suit and engage in illegal activities. For instance, a 24-year-old man in Japan once dressed up as the Joker—a notorious fictional villain—and set a train on fire after stabbing his fellow passengers. If the level of violence in films were properly controlled, such incidents would be less likely to occur.
In conclusion, while films are entertaining and financially beneficial without regulation of violent elements, I believe the government should control the level of brutality in films to prevent juvenile delinquency and crimes committed by adults.