Some people claim that artworks in some aspects like painting, music , poetry are for everyone to create while others argue that only innate talented people can make those works. Personally, I align more with the first belief.
To begin with, poets, painters and composers can make money from their unique artworks and special abilities that not everyone has. This is because aesthetic was born mostly for people with aptitude for it that helps them gain public recognition with distinctive and quality products. For crample, we call Vincent van Gogh a painter because of his post – impressionist works and impressive insight that differ from non- professional people who aren’t called painters. Thus, an authentic artwork will be created in the most natural way by special talented people.
However, art doesn’t stop only at authentic artworks instead for serving human’s aesthetic demands which allows everyone to make their art no matter if it is right or wrong. One primary point to make is that people create art before create artist which proves that art was born from everyone and always for everyone to try. Particularly, painting, singing and writing poetry to serve people’s own mental demands are their own right and aren’t banned. An illustration for this point is that we sing any songs we want in our home to feel related and also paint about the sky or our beloved people to survey. Moreover, if we limit the amount of people accessing art, this aspect will never become famous like this. Artists create their products with the desire that their artworks can come to public as much as possible. As a result, painting, music and poetry. are noticed widely that open an opportunity for hidden talented people to express their special abilities. Therefore, art should be owned by everyone as it comes from the public and also goes to the public.
In conclusion, while the belief that art should only be for artists can be understood, we should emphasize that art always is ours who make and have an ear for it everyday.