The debate over the consequences of hosting international sporting events is a contentious issue. While proponents argue that it brings many benefits, opponents insist that it has more drawbacks. This essay will discuss both perspectives and argue in favor of the former notion.
On one hand, proponents highlight several key advantages. To begin with, hosting sporting events can help the country to grow economically. Because such major tournaments draw a significant amount of foreign investment and revenue to the country, which can be used to improve public facilities and sectors. Also, developing countries, for instance, can gain economic stability due to the amount of profit they can make from selling tickets, sponsorships, and telecasting the events. Additionally, such events also open new job opportunities for many. Since managing big events requires a large number of workers, individuals can easily start working there and earn their living, especially the unemployed ones.
On the other hand, opponents argue that the drawbacks are also concerning. Firstly, the development of such events can lead to the exploitation of workers. Since workers come from different socioeconomic backgrounds, they can be easily mistreated, abused, and paid less as they cannot do anything due to their constraints. Furthermore, misallocation of public funds can also create distress among the citizens as the budget of such events comes from taxpayers’ money. They often voice their concerns about whether the authorities can properly use their money for its desired cause.
In conclusion, while I admit that the concerns about the mentioned disadvantages are valid, I also believe the advantages it brings, such as economic growth and working opportunities, outweigh its drawbacks.