There is an ongoing debate about what an appropriate educational process is. Some individuals suggest that schools differentiate students based on their academic skills. Others, however, believe that classrooms should be represented by pupils with varied intellectual capacities. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.
On the one hand, accepting young people according to their skills and knowledge, educational establishments greatly benefit from it. First, it contributes to a high level of academic performance, representing a school as a respectable institution. Second, educators may find it easier to navigate an educational process if all students already have necessary theoretical knowledge alongside practical skills. For instance, there is little likelihood that many pupils lag behind, requiring additional effort and time to explain information, which saves academic hours for other matters. Moreover, what pupils may take advantage of when studying with their studious peers is competitiveness. Being surrounded by knowledgable young people, they are likely to push themselves, studying even better, to raise knowledge and develop their minds. However, in practice, this approach poses the risk of discrimination and prejudice, as less prepared children are disadvantaged.
On the other hand, the second approach, whereby pupils with various academic abilities study together, contributes to inclusion, equality, and tolerance. When nurturing all children as equals, the school sets positive examples of well-rounded and nondiscriminatory schooling. Thus, seeing diversity, children are likely to grow into tolerant and thoughtful adults. Additionally, both weaker and cleverer pupils can make use of such an approach. To illustrate, the latter may help the former understand study materials and, as a result, both groups may boost their minds.
Personally, I fundamentally believe that there should be no room for differentiation as it relates to public schooling. What the school is bound to do is support and educate everyone, but not discriminate. However, it is worth noting that private establishments, such as gymnasiums with an emphasis on research or particular areas of education, can choose students based on their academic credentials to educate those who can live up to a high-pressure academic load.
To summarize, I lean toward the nondiscriminatory approach when all types of students are allowed to study. Nonetheless, in some cases, educational establishments can be permitted to differentiate pupils to choose only those who satisfy their requirements.
