These days, the issue of robots and science subjects has long been a controversial debate. While some people support that students should learn science subjects, there are some people who support that students should study robots. In my opinion, I totaly agree with the former point of view. This essay will discuss both side of the debate.
On the other hand there are some people who support the idea that students should learn science subjects. Firstly, they may assert that the science subjects is important and beneficial. From a personal perspective, it can argued that the science subjects provide a job opportunities and better salaries and therefore an improved quality of life for students who take advantage of them. On the social level, by forcing people to chooses the particular learning the science subjects. Secondly, students ensure that any knowledge and skill gaps in the science subjects covered. Finally, focus on the science subjects could lead to new inventions, economic growth and greater future prosperity. For example, many students in Vietnam learn science subjects as a mandatory part in their programmes.
On the other hand there are some people who support that students should study robots. One main argument would be that socity will benefit more if students are passionnate about what they are doing. Besides, people can predict which areas of the robots to be useful to the society in the future, and people need to develop critical thinking skills to find solutions. If this was case, perhaps we could need more solution. For exmaple, in Vietnam the government have some the polices to solve this issue such as education, medical and so on.
To sum up, it is verry defficult to decide which view is better. However, I fully support that students should learn science subjects. People should think the future issue and people will have the best polution for the issue.