In the opinion of some individuals group activities better improve a person’s intellectual abilities rather than any other sources. Despite this, I can’t entirely agree with this statement.
First of all, group activities have some advantages for individuals, such as communication, environment, better co-op skills, and leadership characteristics. Experience with co-op is able to improve communication skills for a person because any group activities are interactions between people. Furthermore, on some occasions, great environments are able to be a source of motivation, for example, the majority of corporations prefer real live gatherings with their employees rather than online meetings. Finally, co-op and leadership abilities are always useful for every situation, beginning with a routine to big deals between companies.
Despite the facts made above, I still consider that group activities depend on the personal characteristics of an individual because there is no scientific proof of this statement, a maximum some unconfirmed dates from unknown surveys. Although, group actions might develop useful abilities but for some people, it is unusual and not convenient. Moreover, logically co-op cannot influence the effectiveness of people’s brains. Additionally, an experiment in Chinese between the teenager groups and solo-prepared groups for the exam presents equal rates of successful scores. It also confirmed the fact that group activities are not better than other sources of development.
In conclusion, every argument above makes it clear that group activities do not biggest influence on individual success. In addition, I should concede that group actions may be beneficial in some terms.