One school of thought holds that increasing the minimum legal age for driving motor vehicles can foster route safety. While this idea could help lessen the number of accidents on the road. I mostly disagree with this option and maintain that permitting for some vehicles is the most feasible solution.
On the one hand, this formula might diminish the incidents caused by inexperienced drivers. In fact, due to the inadequate age, teenagers can have more time to broaden their horizon about the law and driving knowledge. As growing older, they could completely form their self-perception and comprehend about the sophisticated traffic systems. As a result, when reaching certainly adequate age, they could drive more carefully by themselves due to the fulfillment of theory and practical lessons that acquired before.
On the other hand, I contend that limiting the kind of automobiles could be a best option. In reality, adolescents could have an opportunity to afford their automobiles as long as the type of transports are restricted based on suitable age. For instance, in Vietnam, high school students who are under 18 years old, are allowed to drive “Cub” bikes or electric bikes, which are light and simple for them to ride on roads. While other brands including “Wave” or “Yamaha” are forbidden due to their functions as heavy motorcycles. As a consequence, this effortless policy could enable youngsters to drive some motorbikes, but not all kinds of heavy vehicles.
In conclusion, while lowest the legit lifetime of driving can partly tackle the road security issue, I am inclined that the ideal solution should be to restrict the age of utilizing transport. It is predicted that once resolution is taken, young individuals could participate in traffic systems safely.