It is often thought that several schools do not have a tendency to teach children to write with a pen. I believe that learners should be taught with a balanced approach because handwriting develops students’ cognitive progress and preserves cultural heritage; however, solely focusing on handwriting can have a detrimental impact on the environment and hinder their ability to engage with modern technology.
Writing expression improves children’s intellectual advancement and conserves historical inheritance. Penmanship engages different parts of the brain, which assists in improving physiological development such as problem solving, multi-tasking, memory retention, and overall mental acuity. Furthermore, written manuscripts relate to our cultural endeavours, which is why they are essential for juveniles to grasp regarding their diversity. Consequently, written expression plays a vital role in shaping regional activities that are necessary for protecting divergence.
On the other hand, only concentrating on handwriting could have a deleterious effect on the surroundings and prevent engaging with cutting-edge technology. Emphasising penmanship leads to increased paper usage, which has environmental implications since people cut down trees for making paper, which increases carbon emissions in the environment. Moreover, while handwriting skills have historical significance, focusing solely on handwriting may hinder students’s adaptability to new technologies and modes of communication. For instance, if children depend more solely on writing expression than typing, they will struggle to adapt to modernization.
In conclusion, presently, it is believed that students do not get to learn writing skills with a pen in several schools. I strongly believed that children ought to be taught handwriting with an impartial approach.