There is an ongoing debate about automation in the different categories. Some individuals believe that aspect can lead to unemployment and social unrest, while others argue that that situation will create new opportunities and contribute to overall convenience. This essay will discuss both views and explain, why i firmly believe that, although unemployment and social unrest may appear, its overall impact has been largely positive.
Supporters of this view argue that, it will lead to widespread unemployment and social instability. They believe that many workers, especially those with low skills will struggle to find new jobs as machines replace human work. At this time, many work categories have already changed. For instance, proffesions such as designers, video editors, and even coffee makers replaced by automated systems. In addition, that leads to confidence. In other words, people should learn new development for reaching money. As a result, people may lose confidence and face difficulties adapting to new working conditions, which can create social problems.
However, critics of automation believe that aspect will improve the overall people’s quality of life. The main reason is that, it can lead to many benefits such as new opportunities and safety. Moreover, machines can work only in dangerous ares, where people cannot be. For instance, in areas such as cities Chernobyl in Ukraine or Semey in Kazakhstan because of atomic bombs experiences, people still cannot work or live. Machines with remotely control can work on radiation and in future may help to reduce that aspect. As a result, machines can improve overall convinient and help to society, especially in dangerous areas.
In conclusion, although this development can lead to several disadvantages, I strongly believe that aspect has more benefits because automation can improve overall the quality of life.