Nowadays, the popularity of convenience food has increased around the globe, which has subsequently led to serious health problems. Some people claim that the authorities should prohibit such meals in order to prevent the development of diseases. While I agree that fast food can contribute to certain disorders, I do not think that a complete ban is the most reasonable measure.
To start with, in industrialised societies the number of people who suffer from chronic diseases, such as diabetes and heart problems, is rising rapidly . This trend is closely linked to technological innovations, including new means of transportation and methods of preservation, which allow food to be consumed long after it is produced. As a result, people replace traditional diets based on grains and vegetables with processed, high-fat and high-sugar foods. Not only do these products tend to be cheap and accessible, but they also encourage overconsumption. For instance, in countries such as the United States and France, the rates of obesity have risen significantly in recent decades.
However, banning convenience foods entirely would be unrealistic and unfair. Many individuals may rely on ready-made foods by various causes, as an example, long working hours or low income. A strict ban can greatly affect the poor and unjustly restrain freedom of choice as people have the right to decide for themselves what to eat. Instead, governments should regulate the marketing of instant foods, especially for children, and promote far more beneficial alternatives.
To conclude, although proccessed meals undeniably influence the public’s well-being, banning them is unappropriate solution. It is changing the aggressive advertising of such food that offers a more realistic and sustainable option.