Initial urban design is undoubtedly the cornerstone of a city, which has for a long time sparked a contentious debate surrounding its major focus. A school of thought opines that it should emphasize public green zones and sports facilities rather than shopping malls. I partially concur with this statement since both of the ideas have their own merits and demerits.
It is undeniable that laying emphasis on specialized spaces for sports and parks does citizens good for numerous reasons. First of all, an area for physical activities encourages people to lead a more healthy life. For further elaboration, since sports facilities are now publicly accessible to the populace, it is likely that people have more incentive to frequently undertake exercises that help them build up their own stamina and physicality. Furthermore, a sufficient amount of open space instills people with a sense of natural belonging, which not only improves their responsibility for protecting the environment but also enables them to have a place to unwind after a nerve-racking week.
However, the advantages of facilitating the construction of shopping centers should be taken into consideration. To begin with, commercial-related facilities play a crucial role in boosting the economic growth of the city. To be more specific, shopping malls provide a prodigious number of jobs for the city’s residents, such as accountants or employees in the service systems. This, in fact, makes a huge contribution to the act of mitigating the negative impacts of employment and fostering a stable economic rise. In addition, the flourishing of a buying center meets the constantly growing demands of household appliances, creating a conditional environment for the citizens.
In conclusion, I assert that city planners should strike a balance and distribute an equal focus on green spaces, sports facilities, and commercial buildings since all of these features are beneficial to the lives of the urban population.