Government funds should prioritize medical research on human health over healthy environment. However, I reckon that money should be allocated for environment presentation for following reasons.
Providing capital for environment can lead to long-term benefits for both planet and human health. It can reduce pollution leading to fewer health problems. To be more precise, a poor living habitat would impact on people’s well-being. For example, these living areas with low quality of air can lead to some threats such as cough or lung diseases. However, paying out for medical research on people’s health would help scientists to do experiments in order to have comprehensive knowledge. Experience cost might be high due to requirements of chemical substances and suitable gadgets. These can support researchers for high levels of cognition, leading them to adopt an adequate treatment, improving people’s well-being.
Moreover, spending for ecosystem can maintain biodiversity, too. If we try to protect environment and preserve natural habitats, it can support a wide range of plant and animal species. These are the most crucial things of the good ecosystem. Furthermore, climate stability can be the result of environment preservation. This is to say, reducing greenhouse gas emissions helps mitigate climate change, leading to more stable weather patterns and less extreme weather events. So, it may be more valuable if we pay attention to the harmful gases which have considerable huge effects on our planet in many cases.
To conclude, I can say that, it would be worthwhile to pay out for environment protection because of several reasons. Allocating for environment preservation would benefit for both people and ecosystem. It can reduce pollution, maintain biodiversity, help to mitigate climate change, although there are some benefits to spend on medical research such as to have deep understanding and knowledge to maintain their health in a good state.