Literature is universally accepted to be a compulsory subject at secondary and high schools. However, there are opposing views as to whether local literature or global literature should be prioritized. Although I believe that studying local literature can have its advantages, I believe that international literature should be equally important, since it contributes to the development of knowledge and emotions.
It is undeniable that literary works of local population play an essential role in providing insights into the past. By writing novels, poems, and plays, many national authors try to reflect a country’s traditions, values and historical experiences. Reading these works of art could help students gain a sense of identity and develop pride of their history. By reading poems about passion, for example, young people can not only appreciate the artistic expression but also gain insight into how relationships were understood in the past. Given this basic fact, it is only right that local literature is included in the syllabus of secondary and high schools.
Exposing learners to global literature, on the other hand, can have profound effects. Literature from different countries broaden students’ horizon by providing information on new cultures, ideas, and historical events. Such action can help strengthen bonds between diverse communities by gaining information about each other. Additionally, since global literature are often published in foreign languages, students can receive an opportunity to learn these languages. For example, the novels of Russian author, Mr. Dostoyevsky are popular all around the world and encourage many individuals to read them in Russian rather than their native languages.
In conclusion, I believe that the most effective approach is a balanced curriculum that incorporates both local and international literature, since each offers unique benefits for students’ intellectual and cultural development.