The issue of the severity of punishment given to criminals has become the topic of intense debate. Some argue that by fixating the levels of punishments for crimes, we can fast-track judgements, while others believe that important aspects of committing a crimina activity, such as the motive, individual psychological and physical state should be considered when deciding the levels of judicial sentences. Although both views hold value, in my opinion, criminal activities are very dynamic and should be dealt with one-on-one basis.
Proponents of this thought often cite, time spent until prosecution, as one of the most important resources, that is wasted, while a criminal awaits trial. By introducing fixed punishments for crimes, we can deliver justice more efficiently and effectively. Compartmentalizing criminal behavior and then setting up punishment levels accordingly, can instill a deeper sense of regard for law and order in the community. By fast-tracking these criminal cases, the judicial system can save vital public resources and funnel them in other important tasks. Petty crimes like theft and public misdemeanor can be dealt with smoothly in this manner, all while ensuring public safety and delivering justice. Indore, in India, leads this line of thought with an exemplary demonstration where the Supreme Court of India authorized local civic bodies to manage such cases by providing them with a 24/7 mobile judiciary system.
However, contenders believe there are some caveats to this model. The Constitution allows every citizen to exercise basic human rights under all circumstances. The criminal’s psychiatric condition plays a pivotal role in their criminal behavior. Irrespective of the nature of the committed crime, what we can not omit is the motive behind it. Many a times it has been observed that criminal activities are fueled by undiagnosed mental illnesses such as depression, anxiety and BPD. Often these people act out of impulses that they can not fathom, rather than vengeance or any other evil thoughts. They might need meedical attention more than any form of punishments, which might deteriorate their condition further. Taking into consideration these factors, health can not be put in detriment to justice. The UN court allows supreme courts of most of the EU countries to refer such intense cases to deliver justice without any bias.
In conclusion, by setting fixed punishment standards, we can save substantial amount of time and money which can be beneficial to the community. However, the dynamics of law and order does allow everyone to have a fair trial and in accordance with that the motive of a crime has to be taken into consideration.