In many parts of the globe, individuals’ salaries have become a controversial topic. While many people believe that paying the greatest amount of wages for the minority of people is not a problem for the government, others argue that salaries should be managed and limited to a certain amount of earnings by the country. In my view, it is essential control individuals’ salaries and publicize the certain amount of them because it allows avoid inequality and poverty, and keep good economy of a country.
On the one hand, supporters of the first view claim that if a few people are financially well-off, this is normal for a country. This is because paying higher wages to people is a great way to improve the quality of life of individuals. For instance, according to the statistics, in India, the average life quality of people is lower than other countries due to low income. Hence, they believe that higher salary provides higher quality of life in a country.
On the other hand, those who disagree argue that managing citizens’ income and attaching fair wages to all people are more beneficial, and I side with this view. The main reason is that if the only minority of residents become very affluent and others are suffering from lack of money, it causes inequality in the society. As a result, it can lead to widespread poverty and declining economic conditions in a country. For example, in many countries, the social gap between the wealthy and the poor is the main issue. Therefore, this group supports controlled and limited income as a way to build an equal and wealthy society.
To sum up, although both sides make valid arguments, I personally believe that a managed and equal salary is the better choice because it avoids social problems such as poverty and inequality between people and maintains economic stability in a country.