In modern society, particularly among the youth, there is an ongoing debate about whether universities should prioritize practical courses that enhance employment prospects instead of offering subjects such as history and philosophy regarding the increase in tuition fees. Half of the respondents believe that these changes would enhance students’ employment opportunities, whereas the other half argues in favor of preserving the traditional education system and maintaining the existing curriculum. I largely agree that universities should prioritize practical courses that improve employability; however, subjects such as history and philosophy should not be removed entirely.
On the one hand, people are not satisfied with increasing tuition fees they have to pay even for non practical courses which they assume are useless. They think students are wasting their time and potential on studying subjects such as history that will not be needed in the future, thus, they tend to prefer practical courses. Practical courses provide students with the specific skills and knowledge required for employers. They also help students gain a better understanding of their future professions, and, as a result it will be easier for them to adapt and secure employment after graduation.
On the other hand, theoretical subjects like history and philosophy remain as the essential components in education for over centuries. Subjects like history and philosophy develop important intellectual skills. Additionally, they enhance students’ critical thinking and problem solving skills resulting in a deeper understanding of society, culture, and human behavior. Even if not directly job-related, they provide long term values such as developing adaptability in different professions
Overall, it is clear that both practical courses and humanities are equally important and should be given equal emphasis in universities.