There is an on going dabate about wethere having a long working time is essential for more economically successful than other countries. Some people aruge that long average working time can have workforce for country, while other people say that long working time will cause only disadvatages. In my opinion, having a long working time isn’t the only thing that lead one country to success.
At first glance, having a long working time and offer more workforce to one country. For one thing, people stand for this reason claim that long working time equal to more outcome for country. For example, many of people when their work time are over, they put down what they currently do no matter it need to be finished today or not, while if people can have longer working time, this may not happen. In addition, they say that people can cultivate wide range of abilities at work, such as commnucation, learship, and teamwork. Due to this reason, they say having a long working time can cultivate good person for country.
The aforementioned points, however, are not entire correct. To begin with, people with a short working time sometime may have better product than those have long working time. For instance, people will suffer a lot of stress when facing a 10-hour work nearly everday, and people who stay under this environment for a long time will lead to burnout, making them lazy at work. Moreover, having appropriate rest is more vital than working time. When people go back to work after a long period of vocation, they often fell confident and full of energy, which can make people have better productivety.
In conclusion, although having a long working time seem a better option beacuse of more time for people to allocate and learning skill, having appropriate rest and keep the productivety are the most important things for country have more economically successful than other countries.